A label, but not that one
Somebody’s getting married, and I think we need a new lottery. Based on what? Let’s just say that I had a little tip, and if I had the kind of bookie smarts that our national betting corporation uses for flogging that 49 thing, I’d be all over this one.
The prince (not the musical one), the other one; the one with the ever so tiny ties to Canada is going to the altar this summer. What altar? When? With whom? Two out of three can win big pounds. Just sayin’.
Another tip. If you want to get rich, market your line of computer labels and the software to print upon those same labels to offices everywhere. You can even pretend that the stuff will work with “office”. Not every version, but let the consumer find that out the hard way. If I were to do a statistical analysis of frequently encountered problems in computer support departments, I’d be willing to bet that label printing woes would surpass everything else.
That’s based on years of observation. Back when there was only one size of sticky label, everything was hunky-dory. Now, with the variety of sizes and formats requiring five digits to catalog, we can put a tag on anything that stands still for more than a few seconds. However…
Putting a tag that is properly centered, with multiple font sizes, and the requirement that it be produced “in house”; that’s a different scale of problem. Plus, every time that someone changes the word processor, or the printer, or updates the person behind the keyboard, the game starts all over again.
Ask yourself: Is printing a label worth the stress? I didn’t think so.
